NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Blacktown City Council v Jason Gabriel Saker (No 4) [2022] NSWLEC 80 Hearing dates: 30 June 2022 Date of orders: 06 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: See orders at [131]. Catchwords: CONTEMPT: sentencing for contempt – breach of Court orders – contempt ongoing – appropriate penalty – seriousness of contempt – wilful and contumacious contempt – whether environmental harm occasioned by the contempt – contempt committed without regard for public safety – whether contempt committed for financial gain – no plea of guilty – no remorse demonstrated – comparable cases – whether contemnor has capacity to pay a fine – monetary penalty imposed – whether the imposition of a periodic fine appropriate – periodic fine imposed – indemnity costs ordered. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, ss 3A, 21A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 76B, 124 Fines Act 1996, s 6 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, rr 6.1, 6.3 Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 55 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (NSW) v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 1 NSWLR 362 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Proprietary Limited (1986) 161 CLR 98; [1986] HCA 46 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sigalla (No 4) (2011) 80 NSWLR 113; [2011] NSWSC 62 Blacktown City Council v Jason Gabriel Saker (No 3) [2021] NSWLEC 148 Blacktown City Council v Pearce [2013] NSWLEC 175 Blacktown City Council v Saker (No 2) [2018] NSWLEC 71 Blacktown City Council v Saker [2017] NSWLEC 46 Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 801 Council of the City of Sydney v Owners Corporation - Strata Plan 18945 [2011] NSWLEC 79 Dowling v Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (2018) 99 NSWLR 229; [2018] NSWCA 340 Environment Protection Authority v Hanna (2013) 195 LGERA 383; [2013] NSWLEC 41 Environment Protection Authority v Pannowitz (No 2) (2006) 153 LGERA 126; [2006] NSWLEC 797 Environment Protection Authority v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (No 4) (2011) 186 LGERA; [2011] NSWLEC 246 Environmental Protection Authority v Ableway Waste Management Pty Ltd [2005] NSWLEC 469 Fairfield City Council v Adams (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 45 Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council (No 5) [2011] NSWLEC 104 Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council (No 6) [2011] NSWLEC 132 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125; [2008] HCA 36 Hunters Hill Council v Hakim [2010] NSWLEC 62 Inner West Council v Balmain Rentals Pty Ltd [2022] NSWLEC 20 Ku-Ring-Gai Council v Labordus [2009] NSWLEC 30 Liverpool City Council v Palerma Pty Ltd and Parilo (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 45 Menzies v Paccar Financial Pty Ltd (2016) 93 NSWLR 88; [2016] NSWCA 280 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 3) (2009) 167 LGERA 91; [2009] NSWLEC 92 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 20 Owners Strata Plan 37762 v Pham (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 306 Palerang Council v Banfield (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 158 Pang v Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 69 Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 435; [1999] HCA 19 Pittwater Council v Martoriati [2013] NSWLEC 84 Queanbeyan City Council v Pre-Cast Concrete Solutions Pty Ltd [2008] NSWLEC 147 Queanbeyan City Council v Sun (No 2) (2013) 195 LGERA 14; [2013] NSWLEC 64 Randwick City Council v Arxidia Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 105 Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Maniam (No 2) (1992) 26 NSWLR 309 Sutherland Shire Council v Perdikaris [2020] NSWLEC 111 Tweed Shire Council v Sikiric (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 119 Waverley Council v Tovir Investments Pty Ltd & Rappaport (No 3) [2013] NSWLEC 35 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525; [1995] HCA 3 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1996) 86 A Crim R 183 Category: Sentence Parties: Blacktown City Council (Applicant) Jason Gabriel Saker (First Respondent) Sam Saker (Second Respondent) State of New South Wales (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Norton (Applicant) J Saker (Litigant in person) (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate