NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dragon Property Development & Investment Pty Ltd v 183 Eastwood Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 910 Hearing dates: 4, 5 July 2022 Date of orders: 06 July 2022 Decision date: 06 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Peden J Decision: (1) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff the sum of $1,672,000. (2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed. (3) Grant leave to any party to approach my Associate by email within 7 days of the date of this judgment, should an alternative costs order be sought. (a) That email must provide any evidence relied on together with submissions of no more than 3 pages and be copied to the other party. (b) That other party has leave to provide in response any evidence and submissions of no more than 3 pages within 7 days after receipt of the original material contemplated in order 3(a). (c) The party that made the application has leave to provide reply submissions of no more than 1 page within 2 days after receipt of the response contemplated in order 3(b). Catchwords: EQUITY — Authority of agent — Ostensible authority — Estoppel — Agent altered company's ASIC record and represented himself as the sole director in dealings with a third party — Company directors aware of the alteration for 57 days before agent entered into contract with third party — 116 days before correcting ASIC record — Whether company is bound by the unauthorised agent's dealings — No point of general principle Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Minister for Transport (1989) 86 ALR 119 Brick and Pipe Industries Ltd v Occidental Life Nominees Pty Ltd (1992) 2 VR 279 Caratti v Mammoth Investments [2016] WASCA 84; (2016) 50 WAR 84 Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 Crabtree-Vickers Pty Ltd v Australian Direct Mail Advertising and Addressing Co Pty Ltd (1975) 133 CLR 72 Davison v Vickery's Motors Ltd (in liq) (1925) 37 CLR 1 Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480 Haines Bros Earthmoving Pty Ltd v Rosecell Pty Ltd (2016) 92 NSWLR 47 Learn and Play (Rhodes No 1) Pty Limited as Trustee for Rhodes 1 Childcare Centre Unit Trust v David John Frank Lombe [2011] NSWSC 1506 Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990) 170 CLR 146 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451 Permanent Trustee Co Ltd v Bernera Holdings Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 56 Pollard v Wilson [2010] NSWCA 68 Soyfer v Earlmaze [2000] NSWSC 1068 Taylor v Smith (1926) 38 CLR 48 Winau Aust Pty Ltd v LCC Property Development Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 434 Winau Aust Pty Ltd v LCC Property Development Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 9 Wood v Inglis [2008] NSWSC 1147 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dragon Property & Investment Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) 183 Eastwood Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: W Chan and A Flick (Plaintiff) F Lim, Solicitor (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate