NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JD v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2022] NSWSC 911 Hearing dates: 5 July 2022 Decision date: 08 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Ierace J Decision: (1) Time to file the summons is extended to 14 February 2022; (2) The order made in the Children's Court on 19 October 2021, that the plaintiff breached a condition of bail, is set aside; (3) Each party to pay its own costs. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeal and review – Application for leave to appeal from interlocutory decision of Local Court under s 53(3)(b) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) – where sentencing decision and bail variation application listed on same day before a Children's Court Magistrate – where Magistrate made finding of failure to comply with a bail condition following sentencing decision – whether Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to make a failure to comply finding because no substantive proceedings were pending or otherwise – meaning of "bail decision" in the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) – consideration of appropriate form of relief – alternatively, whether Magistrate applied incorrect standard of proof in making a failure to comply finding Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), ss 4, 8, 15, 32, 51, 77, 77A, 78, 79 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), s 15A Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 3, 53(3)(b) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 69, 75 Cases Cited: Attorney General for New South Wales v XX (2018) 98 NSWLR 1012; [2018] NSWCCA 198 Belan v Commissioner of Corrective Services [2020] NSWSC 1503 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v O'Conner (2006) 181 A Crim R 294; [2006] NSWSC 458 Gaudie v Local Court of New South Wales and Anor (2013) 235 A Crim R 98; [2013] NSWSC 1425 R v Hilton (1987) 7 NSWLR 745 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JD (Plaintiff) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (First Defendant) Children's Court of NSW (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Styles (sol) (Plaintiff) R Coffey (First Defendant) Submitting Appearance (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate