NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Karatasas v Inner West Council [2022] NSWLEC 1367 Hearing dates: 29 June 2022 Date of orders: 12 July 2022 Decision date: 12 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development application DA/2021/0878 for the removal of the existing fence, the construction of a replacement fence, and the removal of the existing tree at 32 Carlisle Street, Leichhardt, is granted subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A. (3) Exhibits A, B and C are retained, and the remaining exhibits are returned. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – removal of tree – whether tree has caused damage – whether requirements of a development control plan are met for its removal – evidence is that tree has caused damage and will cause future damage Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55 Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2013, cl 5.10 Texts Cited: Inner West Council, Tree Management Development Control Plan, (February 2020) Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Vicky Karatasas (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Conomos (Solicitor) (Applicant) R Wilcher (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: Conomos Legal (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/307234 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate