NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Application by Shelden Patrick Vaughan pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 920 Hearing dates: On the papers. Decision date: 08 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: The application is refused. Catchwords: Application under s 78(1) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 for inquiry into sentence – two serious violence offences – domestic violence context – applied unsuccessfully to Court of Criminal Appeal for leave to appeal sentence – primary complaint in relation to appraisal on sentence of expert medical evidence on mental health – no new material or arguments – no doubt or question as to any mitigating circumstances or any part of the evidence – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 27, 33 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Pt 7, ss 78, 79 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure Act) 1999 (NSW), s 25D Cases Cited: Application of Peter James Holland under s.78 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2008] NSWSC 251 Azzopardi v R [2019] NSWCCA 306 Buttrose v Attorney General of New South Wales (2015) 324 ALR 562; [2015] NSWCA 221 Chapman v R [2018] NSWSC 1741 Clarke v R [2015] NSWCCA 232 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) (2003) 214 CLR 318; [2003] HCA 28 Elyard v R [2006] NSWCCA 43 Gibbons (a pseudonym) v R [2019] NSWCCA 150 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Haines v R [2016] NSWCCA 90 Hordern v R [2019] NSWCCA 138 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606; [1984] HCA 46 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 229 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Helmsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v O'Donoghue (1988) 34 A Crim R 397 R v Shine [2016] NSWCCA 149 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; [2000] NSWCCA 309 R v Verdins (2007) 16 VR 269; [2007] VSCA 102 Robinson v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 192 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 The Queen v Guode (2020) 267 CLR 141; [2020] HCA 8 Varley v Attorney General (NSW) (1987) 8 NSWLR 30 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shelden Patrick Vaughan (Applicant) Attorney General for New South Wales (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant) Mr M Dalla-Pozza (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate