NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BMA Urban Planning Consultants Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1388 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference 13 July 2022 Date of orders: 22 July 2022 Decision date: 22 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away by the amendment of the development application pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $6,760.00. (2) The appeal is upheld. (3) Development Application DA/533/2021 for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a part 3 and part 4 storey residential flat building in 2 built forms comprising nine apartments, basement parking, landscaping and associated works at 5 Severn Street, Maroubra is determined by the granting of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure "A" to these orders. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition and construction of a new residential flat building – amended plans – planning and urban design experts agree contentions are resolved - agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 50, 55 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.7, 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 6.7 State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No 55—Remediation of Land, cl 7 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 (Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development), cl 28 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, cl 4.6 Texts Cited: Department of Planning and Environment, Apartment Design Guide (July 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: BMA Urban Planning Consultants Pty Ltd (Applicant) Randwick City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: I Hemmings SC (Applicant) T Poisel (Applicant) V McGrath (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate