NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LCT-MRE Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee of the LCT-MRE Trust and in its personal capacity) v Thiess Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 969 Hearing dates: 23 and 30 June and 7 July 2022 Decision date: 22 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Ball J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the plaintiffs to file an Amended Technology and Construction List Statement in the form provided to the Court on 11 July 2022 with the following paragraphs deleted: (a) Paragraph 69, particulars (i)(d)(1) and (2); (b) Paragraph 71B(d); (c) Paragraph 71F(c); (2) Reserve to the trial judge the question of when the amendments take effect; (3) Order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants' costs thrown away by reason of the amendments; (4) Order that the plaintiffs pay the defendants' and cross-defendants' costs of the motion filed on 7 June 2022. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Pleadings — Amendment — Form and content of pleading — Whether proposed amendment alleges design deficiencies with sufficient clarity — Whether proposed amendments alleging certain other defects should be allowed where, had the allegations been made earlier, the defendants could have brought a cross-claim Cases Cited: LCT-MRE Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee of the LCT-MRE Trust and in its personal capacity) v Thiess Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 317 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: LCT-MRE Nominees Pty Ltd (as trustee of the LCT-MRE Trust and in its personal capacity) (First Plaintiff) LCT-MRE Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) Thiess Pty Ltd (First Defendant | First Cross-Claimant) John Holland Pty Ltd (Second Defendant | Second Cross-Claimant) CIMIC Group Ltd (Third Defendant) WSP Australia Pty Ltd (First Cross-Defendant) ACN 006 475 056 Pty Limited (Second Cross-Defendant) ACN 061 447 621 Pty Limited (Third Cross-Defendant) GE Power NZ Holdings Pty Ltd (Fourth Cross-Defendant) UGL Rail Pty Ltd (Fifth Cross-Defendant) AECOM Services Pty Ltd (Sixth Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Shipway (Plaintiffs) PS Braham SC (First to Third Defendants | First and Second Cross-Claimants) J Giles SC (First and Second Cross-Defendants) AF Girgis (Sixth Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate