NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Van Gestal [2022] NSWSC 973 Hearing dates: 19 July 2022 Date of orders: 21 July 2022 Decision date: 22 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: See [161] Catchwords: CRIME — bail — detention application — application made following conviction and before sentencing — consideration of section 22B of the Bail Act 2013 — whether the accused person will be sentenced to imprisonment to be served by full-time detention — whether special or exceptional circumstances exist STATUTORY INTERPRETATION — legislative purpose — where meaning of provision ambiguous in the context in which it appears — construction which promotes purpose of provision preferred Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 Pt 3, Divs 2, 2A, ss 3, 32, 49, 50, 66(2) Bail Regulation 2021 r 45 Crimes Act 1900 Pt 3, Div 10, ss 61E(1), 61M(1), 76 Crimes (Amendment) Act 1989 Sch 1 cl 2 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 5, 25AA, 67 Crimes (Sexual Assaults) Amendment Act 1981 Sch 1 cl 8 Criminal Legislation Amendment (Child Sexual Abuse) Act 2018 Sch 1 cl 7 Interpretation Act 1987 s 33 Cases Cited: Bobbi v R [2021] NSWCCA 44 Carnaby v The Queen [2021] NSWCCA 203 CCM Holdings Trust Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWSC 1072 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1; [1992] HCA 64 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384; [1997] HCA 2 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Day [2022] NSWSC 938 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Duncan [2022] NSWSC 927 El-Hilli and Melville v R [2015] NSWCCA 146 Esso Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union (2017) 263 CLR 551; [2017] HCA 54 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503; [2012] HCA 55 Lodhi v R [2006] NSWCCA 121 Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261; [1957] HCA 7 MCP Muswellbrook Pty Ltd v Deutsche Bank (Asia) AG (1988) 12 NSWLR 16 Minister for Home Affairs v Benbrika [2021] HCA 4; 95 ALJR 166 Momcilovic v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 1; [2011] HCA 34 R v Obbens [2022] NSWCCA 109 R v Williams [2020] NSWCCA 348 Robertson v City of Nunawading [1973] VR 819 Stephens v R [2021] NSWCCA 152 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531; [2014] HCA 9 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Applicant) Robert Van Gastel (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Kotsis (Applicant) S Schaudin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate