NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Transport for NSW v Chapoterera [2022] NSWSC 976 Hearing dates: 08 July 2022 Date of orders: 08 July 2022 Decision date: 26 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: (1) Allow the appeal brought pursuant to s 56(1)(c) of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001. (2) Set aside the order of the Local Court at Gosford (Magistrate A. George) on 1 December 2021 in proceedings No. 2021/00299520. (3) The proceedings be remitted to the Local Court at Gosford to be heard and determined according to law by a Magistrate other than his Honour Magistrate A. George. (4) No order as to costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – summary proceedings – where Magistrate dismissed charges on submissions by the accused without sworn evidence – where Magistrate prompted to hold a hearing but refused – where hearing was apparently not "justified" and would "waste the Court's time" – where prosecutor was denied the opportunity to make submissions on the law – process fundamentally flawed – proceedings seriously miscarried CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – hearing – examination and cross-examination of witnesses – discussion of statutory obligations in summary proceedings – Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) ch 4 pts 2 and 3 APPEALS – from Local Court to Supreme Court – procedural fairness – hearing rule – failure to comply with statutory provisions – failure to give adequate reasons – grounds of appeal upheld – consideration of judicial review or statutory appeal APPEALS — jurisdiction of appellate court — Supreme Court – whether remittal available on statutory appeal – power to make "such other order as it thinks just" – Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) ss 56 and 59 – remittal ordered Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 56 and 59 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ch 4 pts 2 and 3, ss 190, 194, 195 and 202 Road Rules 2014 (NSW) r 300 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 69 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) pt 51B r 10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 59.3 Cases Cited: ACN 087 528 774 Pty Ltd (formerly Connex Trains Melbourne Pty Ltd) v Chetcuti (2008) 21 VR 559; [2008] VSCA 274 AK v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438; [2008] HCA 8 Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596 Australian Gas Light Co v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Beckner v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1991) 30 FCR 49 Boral Gas (NSW) Pty Ltd v Magill (1993) 32 NSWLR 501 Bradley v Senior Constable Chilby [2020] NSWSC 145s Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Carly Anne Coles v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2022] NSWSC 960 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Belani [2005] NSWSC 1013 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Gatu [2014] NSWSC 192 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Lopez-Aguilar [2013] NSWSC 1019 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mahamed [2022] NSWSC 147 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Peckham [2022] NSWSC 713 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Zhang [2007] NSWSC 308 Director of Public Prosecutions (SA) v District Court of South Australia (2005) 92 SASR 94; [2005] SASC 260 DL v The Queen (2018) 266 CLR 1; [2018] HCA 26 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Broken Hill South Ltd (1941) 65 CLR 150 Housing Commission (NSW) v Tatmar Pastoral Co (1983) 3 NSWLR 378 International Finance Trust Company Ltd v NSW Crime Commission (2009) 240 CLR 319; [2009] HCA 49 Kostas v HIA Insurance Services Pty Ltd trading as Home Owners Warranty [2007] NSWSC 315 Lake Macquarie City Council v Morris (2005) 63 NSWLR 263; [2005] NSWSC 387 Miles v Slack [2022] NSWSC 926 O'Neil-Shaw v The Queen [2010] NSWCCA 42 Poliakov v Magistrate Andrew George (2009) 212 A Crim R 461; [2009] NSWSC 1133 Public Service Board of NSW v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Palu (2002) 134 A Crim R 174; [2002] NSWCCA 381 Sasterawan v Morris [2008] NSWCA 70 Stoker v Adecco Gemvale Constructions Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 449 TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Castel Electronics Pty Ltd (2014) 232 FCR 361; [2014] FCAFC 83 Wise v Schneider [2015] NSWSC 725 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Transport for NSW (Plaintiff) Felix Chapoterera (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Hearnden (solicitor) (Plaintiff) A Chhabra (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate