NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Jenkinson (No. 1) [2022] NSWDC 286 Hearing dates: 07 April 2022 Date of orders: 08 April 2022 Decision date: 08 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Bennett SC DCJ Decision: Find that the quantity of drug for the purposes of this prosecution should be presented as 98 grams of the bulk vegetable matter of which the specified prohibited drug was a part Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Judge alone CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Voir dire CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug — Commercial quantity CRIME — Drug offences — Supply prohibited drug Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Drugs and Poisons Legislation Amendment (New Psychoactive and other Substances) Act 2013 Evidence Act 1995 Poisons Act 1952 (NSW) Cases Cited: Cunningham v R [2017] NSWCCA 222 El Kheir v R [2019] NSWCCA 288 Finch v R [2016] NSWCCA 133 Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 (NSW) Police Offences Amendment (Drugs) Act 1927 (NSW) Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth [2011] FCAFC 132 Woods v R [2017] NSWCCA 5 Woods v R [2020] NSWCCA 219 Texts Cited: 'Dazed and Confused: Accidental Mixtures of Goods and the Theory of Acquisition of Title' (2003) 66 Modern Law Review Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Crown) Thomas Jenkinson (accused) Representation: Carl Young (Crown Prosecutor) Rory Pettit (Counsel for the accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate