NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mallitt v Gow [2022] NSWSC 1012 Hearing dates: 12 July 2022 Date of orders: 28 July 2022 Decision date: 28 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: See paragraph [256] Catchwords: SUCCESSION — Family provision — Claim by person who was, at any particular time, wholly or partly dependent on the deceased and was, at that particular time, or at any other time, a member of the household of which the deceased was a member, for provision from the deceased's estate under Succession Act 2006 (NSW), Ch 3 – No dispute as to eligibility – Then, question whether, having regard to all the circumstances of the case (past or present), there are factors which warrant the making of the application – Dispute about whether there are any such factors – Whether order under the Act should be made and if so, nature and amount of the provision – Order for provision made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2006 (NSW) s 98(4)(c) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) ss 84A, 86 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) s 3 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 3, 55, 57-59, 60-63, 65-66, 72 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alexander v Jansson [2010] NSWCA 176 Andrew v Andrew [2012] NSWCA 308 Askew v Askew [2015] NSWSC 192 Barns v Barns (2003) 214 CLR 169; [2003] HCA 9 Bartlett v Coomber [2008] NSWCA 100 Bassett v Bassett [2021] NSWCA 320 Boettcher v Driscoll (2014) 119 SASR 523; [2014] SASC 86 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1938] AC 463 Bouttell v Rapisarda [2014] NSWSC 1192 Butler v Morris; Butler (bht NSW Trustee & Guardian) v Morris [2012] NSWSC 748 Carey v Robson (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 1199 Chan v Chan (2016) 15 ASTLR 317; [2016] NSWCA 222 Chapple v Wilcox (2014) 87 NSWLR 646; [2014] NSWCA 392 Cooper v Dungan (1976) 50 ALJR 539 de Angelis v de Angelis [2003] VSC 432 Diver v Neal [2009] NSWCA 54 Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 Forsyth v Sinclair (No 2) (2010) 28 VR 635; [2010] VSCA 195 Freeman v Jaques [2006] 1 Qd R 318; [2005] QCA 423 Gardiner v Gardiner (Supreme Court (NSW), Santow J, 28 May 1998, unrep) Goodman v Windeyer (1980) 144 CLR 490; [1980] HCA 31 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Graham v Vukic [2020] NSWSC 1801 Graziani v Graziani (NSWSC, 20 February 1987, unrep), Grey v Harrison [1997] 2 VR 359 Harkness v Harkness (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 35 Ilott v The Blue Cross [2017] 2 WLR 979; [2017] UKSC 17 In the Estate of Puckridge, Deceased (1978) 20 SASR 72 Kay v Archbold [2008] NSWSC 254 Koellner v Spicer [2019] NSWSC 1571 Lewis v Warner [2016] 3 WLR 1545; [2016] EWHC 1787 Lodin v Lodin [2018] HCASL 84. Lodin v Lodin (2017) 16 ASTLR 576; [2017] NSWCA 327 Manuel v Lane [2013] NSWCA 61 Mayfield v Lloyd-Williams [2004] NSWSC 419 McCosker v McCosker (1957) 97 CLR 566; [1957] HCA 82 McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 North v Daniel [2021] NSWSC 828 Palagiano v Mankarios [2011] NSWSC 61 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9; [1962] HCA 19 R (on the application of M) v Slough Borough Council [2008] 1 WLR 1808; [2008] UKHL 52 R v Cook; Ex parte C (1985) 156 CLR 249; [1985] HCA 47 Rakovich v Marszalek [2020] NSWSC 589 Re Allen (deceased) [1922] NZLR 218 Re Dennis (Deceased) [1981] 2 All ER 140 Re Fulop (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Sam Wardy v Gordon Salier; William Wardy v Gordon Salier; Hassiba Wardy v Estate of late Edmond Wadih Wardy, developer and Ch 3 of the Succession Act 2006 [2014] NSWSC 473 Sassoon v Rose [2013] NSWCA 220 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Spata v Tumino [2018] NSWCA 17 Szypica v O'Beirne [2013] NSWSC 297 Tsivinsky v Tsivinsky [1991] NSWCA 269 Verzar v Verzar [2012] NSWSC 1380 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Wilcox v Wilcox [2012] NSWSC 1138 Yee v Yee [2017] NSWCA 305 Texts Cited: Rosalind Atherton, "The Concept of Moral Duty in the Law of Family Provision – a Gloss or Critical Understanding?" (1999) 5 Aust J Leg Hist 5 The Macquarie Dictionary (4th Ed., 2005) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wayne Anthony Mallitt (Plaintiff) Colin James Gow (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Tibbey (Plaintiff) P Glissan (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate