NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Johnson v R [2022] NSWDC 299 Hearing dates: 21 June 2022 Date of orders: 21 July 2022 Decision date: 21 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: (1) Appeal allowed in part. (2) The conviction for sequence 1 and the penalty imposed by the magistrate are set aside. (3) I will hear the parties on the sentence appeal relating to sequence 3. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: AG v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] NSWCA 218 Barca v The Queen (1975) 133 CLR 82 Charara v R [2006] NSWCCA 244 Gianoutsas v Glykis [2006] NSWCCA 137 Lumney v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 186 McNab v Director of Public Prosecutions [2021] NSWCA 298 R v Anderson [2002] NSWCCA 141 R v Coe [2002] NSWCCA 385 Sanchez v R (2009) 196 A Crim R 472 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Samuel Johnson (Appellant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) (Prosecutor) Representation: Counsel: J Lang (Appellant)
Solicitors: ODPP (Prosecutor) Payten Ryan Le (Appellant) File Number(s): 2021/121196 2021/116905 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Downing Centre Local Court Jurisdiction: Local Court Date of Decision: 14 February 2022 Before: Magistrate Bartley File Number(s): 21/121196
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate