NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Everts v Liepins [2022] NSWSC 1021 Hearing dates: 14 July 2022 Date of orders: 14 July 2022 Decision date: 29 July 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: See [79] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – succession – Filing and verification of estate accounts Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56-60 Legal Profession Act 2014 (NSW) Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW) s 85 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 53(3)(a) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 18.7, 54.1, 54.3 Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172; [2000] HCA 40 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Liepins (No 3) [2016] NSWCATOD 51 Gertsch v Roberts; The Estate of Gertsch (1993) 35 NSWLR 631 Hans Pet Constructions Pty Limited v Cassar [2009] NSWCA 230 Hons v Hons (2010) 3 ASTLR 278; [2010] NSWSC 247 Jordan v Goldspring No 2 [2022] NSWSC 780 Kemp v Burn (1863) 66 ER 740 Lezaja v Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 167 McLean v Burns Philp Trustee Co Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 623; (1985) 9 ACLR 926 Nobarani v Mariconte (2018) 265 CLR 236; [2018] HCA 36 NSW Trustee and Guardian as Executor of the Will of Michael Robert Walsh (Dec'd) v Gregory (2012) 18 BPR 35,153; [2012] NSWSC 681 Palmer v Ayres; Ferguson v Ayres (2017) 259 CLR 478; [2017] HCA 5 Phillip Allan Yates v John Norman Phillips Halliday [2006] NSWSC 1346 Re Craig (1952) 52 SR (NSW) 265 Re Estate Schwartz, Deceased; Application of Gellert; Gellert v Bentwood and Schwartz [2015] NSWSC 1484 Re Watson (1904) 49 Sol Jo 54 Satz v ACN 069 808 957 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 365 Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd [2003] 2 AC 709; [2003] UKPC 26 Stamoulos v Constantinidis; Constantinidis v Constantinidis [2017] NSWSC 1808 Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1; [1979] HCA 38 The Estate of Frances Kedesch Michell [2020] NSWSC 1300 The Estate of Maureen Laila Huber, of Cobram VIC; The Estate of Dolf Paul Huber [2020] NSWSC 1539 UBS AG v Tyne (as trustee of the Argot Trust) (2018) 265 CLR 77; [2018] HCA 45 Williams v Stephens (1986) 17 BPR 33,839 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bernt Everts (Applicant) Juris Liepins (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Maltz (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate