NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Zong v Lin [2022] NSWCA 136 Hearing dates: 20 July 2022 Date of orders: 2 August 2022 Decision date: 02 August 2022 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Leeming JA at [93] Kirk JA at [94] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) Appellants to pay the respondents' costs. Catchwords: DAMAGES – Quantum of compensation – overvalue purchase of boat – competing valuation evidence – whether judge had regard to extraneous material not in evidence – where judge questioned defendant's expert about "publicly available information" relevant to perception of buyers – where judge's reasons on the valuation issue unrelated to "publicly available information" CORPORATIONS – Directors and officers – where real and substantial conflict between duty as director and interest as shareholder – where director paid company's money to same solicitor retained by company and director in shareholder dispute – whether breach of fiduciary duty PROCEDURE – whether breach of rule in Browne v Dunn – where affidavit evidence of defendant's belief that solicitor retained in the ordinary course of company's affairs and business – where out-of-court representations by the solicitor as to nature of work – where defendant paid company's money to solicitor – absence of cross-examination of defendant regarding nature of work to which payments related – where fair notice given of plaintiffs' case on timing of payments to solicitor CORPORATIONS – Member's rights and remedies – oppression – compulsory transfer order – transfer of oppressor's shares to other shareholder without payment in return – where relief in derivative action did not fully address oppression – where defendant failed to contribute promised skill and goodwill to the company – where company did not commence its intended business – where compulsory transfer order in the nature of recission of shareholder agreement Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 232, 233, 237 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 42.1, Sch 7 Cases Cited: Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 419; [1936] HCA 40 International Finance Trust Co Ltd v New South Wales Crime Commission (2009) 240 CLR 319; [2009] HCA 49 In the matter of Australian International Yacht Club Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 586 In the matter of Australian International Yacht Club Pty Limited [2021] NSWSC 636 Masterton Homes Pty Ltd v Palm Assets Pty Ltd (2009) 261 ALR 382; [2009] NSWCA 234 Munstermann v Rayward [2017] NSWSC 133 Nassar v Innovative Precasters Group Pty Ltd (2009) 71 ACSR 343; [2009] NSWSC 342 Quinlan v Fiboze Pty Ltd (1998) 14 ACLR 312 Smith Martis Cork & Rajan Pty Ltd v Benjamin Corporation Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 153; (2004) 207 ALR 136 Snell v Glatis (No 2) [2020] NSWCA 166 TAL Life Limited v Shuetrim; MetLife Insurance Limited v Shuetrim (2016) 91 NSWLR 439; [2016] NSWCA 68 Tomanovic v Argyle HQ Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 152 West v Mead (2003) 13 BPR 24,431; [2003] NSWSC 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason Zong (First appellant) Zhenhua Tang (Second appellant) J & G Holding Group Pty Limited (Third appellant) Hui Lin (First respondent) Australian International Yacht Club Pty Limited (Second respondent) Representation: Counsel: M W Young SC (Appellants) S A Lawrance SC (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate