NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Morrison v Ackland [2022] NSWLEC 1413 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 11 May 2022 Date of orders: 10 August 2022 Decision date: 10 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Douglas AC Decision: See orders at [25]. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) – agreement between the parties – conciliation conference – orders – obstruction of view by Magnolia tree – does the tree form a hedge – damage to retaining wall caused by trees Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s34(3), s34 (10) Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2, ss 7, 8, 9, 10, 12; Pt 2A, s 14A Cases Cited: Grantham Holdings Pty Ltd v Miller [2011] NSWLEC 1122 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nolene Morrison (Applicant) John Mervyn Ackland (Respondent) Representation: Cassandra Graves (Solicitor) (Applicant) Nathan Jessop (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors: WMD Law (Applicant) Corbett Jessop Law (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/76642 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: John Ackland and Nolene Morrison share a side boundary between their properties, located on a steeply sloping street in Caringbah South, directly overlooking Yowie Bay to the north-west. Mr Ackland's property is located higher up the hill than Ms Morrison's. 2. This is an unusual situation for 'tree matters', where Mr Ackland submitted an application (File No. 22/9824) with the Land and Environment Court (the Court) on 12 January 2022, pursuant to s 14 of Part 2A of the Trees (Disputes between Neighbours) Act 2006 (the Trees Act) seeking pruning of Ms Morrison's Magnolia grandiflora (Bull Bay Magnolia) (the tree) to remedy a claimed severe obstruction of a view. 3. On 17 March 2022, Ms Morrison also lodged an application with the Court, pursuant to s 7 of Part 2 of the Trees Act seeking to remedy damage that she claims Mr Ackland's trees are causing to the shared boundary fence and retaining wall. 4. Consequently, directions were made by the Registrar of the Court on 5 April 2022, for the applications to be heard together at a conciliation conference under the jurisdiction of s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). For the sake of this judgment, in keeping with the parties intentions under the terms of their subsequent consent orders, Ms Morrison is the applicant and Mr Ackland, the respondent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate