NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v RB [2022] NSWDC 315 Hearing dates: 07 July 2022 Date of orders: 05 August 2022 Decision date: 05 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Lerve DCJ Decision: Presumption of Doli Incapax not rebutted beyond reasonable doubt Catchwords: Alleged historical sexual offending by accused who was under 14 at the time of the allegation – doli incapax – issues of maturity – home life of offender – medical records demonstrating violence when accused was a child Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act, 1987 Evidence Act, 1995 Cases Cited: BC v R [2019] NSWCCA 111 Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Longman v The Queen [1989] HCA 60 Mahmood v Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 397 R v JJ; Ex parte Attorney General (Qld) [2005] QCA 153 RP v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 641; [2016] HCA 53 Rye v Western Australia [2021] WASCA 43 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina RB (a pseudonym) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Pincott, Crown Prosecutor Mr D Mulligan for the Accused
Solicitors: Mr C Hasler, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Ms J Munro and Ms M Cooper, Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2020/128173, 2020/311980 Publication restriction: There must be no publication of the name of the accused or the complainant or anything that might identify either of them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate