NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hoho Property Pty Ltd v Bass Finance No 37 Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1062 Hearing dates: On the papers; final submissions received 22 July 2022 Date of orders: 8 August 2022 Decision date: 08 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Commercial List Before: Rees J Decision: Gross sum costs awarded. Catchwords: COSTS – gross sum costs order – section 98(4)(c), Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – plaintiffs make late amendment to pleadings, leading to vacation of trial – principles at [8]-[16] – whether counsel's cancellation fee should be included – consideration at [21]-[24] – cancellation fee not recoverable – gross sum costs order made. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(4)(c) Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 7 Cases Cited: Baychek v Baychek [2010] NSWSC 987 Bitek Pty Ltd v iConnect Pty Ltd (2012) 290 ALR 288; [2012] FCA 506 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Razzi (No 2) (1991) 30 FCR 64 Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (No 3) [2006] FCA 916 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc [2000] FCA 628 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738; [2002] NSWCA 213 Hoho Property Pty Ltd v Bass Finance No 37 [2021] NSWSC 1289 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2007] NSWSC 23 In the matter of Boss Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 554 Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd v Brockman Iron Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] WASC 345 Sony Entertainment (Australia) Ltd v Smith (2005) 215 ALR 788; [2005] FCA 228 Sparnon v Apand Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 164 The Queen v Martinello [2005] ACTSC 109 Texts Cited: GE Dal Pont, Law of Costs (5th ed, 2021, LexisNexis) Category: Costs Parties: Hoho Property Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff/First Applicant) Ho Ho Top Foods Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff/Second Applicant) Thu Duong Ly (Third Plaintiff/Third Applicant) Trung Hieu Ho (Fourth Plaintiff/Fourth Applicant) Bass Finance No 37 Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Interested Party) Premier Finance Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent/Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Afshar (Plaintiffs/Applicants) Mr R Newlinds SC / Mr T Rogan (First Defendant/Interested Party) Ms FT Roughley (Second Defendant/Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate