Turitsyna v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAP 263

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Turitsyna v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAP 263 Hearing dates: 24 June 2022 Date of orders: 10 August 2022 Decision date: 10 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member G Furness SC, Senior Member Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Leave to appeal is refused. Catchwords: APPEALS- whether Tribunal erred on question of law in rejecting Appellant's objection to Respondent's response to summons to produce documents Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) State Debt Recovery Act 2018 (NSW) Cases Cited: Destination NSW v Taylor [2019] NSWCATAP 123 Di Pietro v Hamilton (unreported), NSW Court of Appeal, 6 September 1990 Edwards v Noble [1971] HCA 54; (1971) 125 CLR 296 Hadid v Redpath [2001] NSWCA 416 Laminex (Australia) Pty Ltd v Smeeth [1999] NSWCA 462 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Limited [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Reid & Robinson Builders Pty Ltd trading as John Robertson Elite Constructions v Cleal [2021] NSWCATAP 348 Resource Pacific Pty Ltd v Wilkinson [2013] NSWCA 33 Ros v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAP 70 Taylor v Office of Destination NSW [2018] NSWCATAD 195 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tatiana Turitsyna (Appellant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: J Helmer (Agent)(Appellant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00065441 Publication restriction: None Applicable Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Citation: None Applicable Date of Decision: 10 February 2022 Before: Senior Member Gatland File Number(s): 2021/00206957