NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Niu v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAD 269 Hearing dates: 19 May 2022 Date of orders: 15 August 2022 Decision date: 15 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J S Currie, Senior Member Decision: The decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue to make and issue an assessment of surcharge purchaser duty of $74,000 and of interest of $3,451 is confirmed. Catchwords: REVENUE LAW- STATE TAXES- surcharge purchaser duty- liability for duty not reduced by reasons of taxpayer's reliance on professional advice. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION- Unreasonable Consequences-Context and purpose of Act-Effect of headings in NSW Acts. Where application of literal meaning of body of section produces strained or unreasonable construction inconsistent with context and purpose of Act. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION-Principle of legality- retrospectivity- no retrospective operation of relevant provision. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW); sections 9, 63. Duties Act 1997 (NSW); Chapter 2A Parts 1, 2 and 4; sections 104G,104N,104R, 104ZE.104ZF, 104ZG, 104ZKA Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) section 5 Taxation Administration Act 1996 (NSW) sections 89, 90, 96, 100. Cases Cited: B & L Linings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2008] NSWCA 187 Bradley v Commonwealth [1973] HCA 34; (1973) 128 CLR 557 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Paspaley [2008] NSW CA 184 Cornish Investments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2013] NSWADTAP Gauci Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 181; (1975) 8 ALR 155 Gao v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2020] NSWCATAD 216 Levich Design Associates Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCATAD 215 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd [1997] HCA 53; (1997) 191 CLR 85 Wacando v Commonwealth [1981] HCA 60; (1981) 148 CLR 1 Texts Cited: Pearce, D, Statutory Interpretation in Australia, 9th edition (2019) paragraphs 2.24, 4.71, 4.73. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jianlei Niu (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E. Kovacs (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate