NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kempe v Complete Community Services Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1095 Hearing dates: 9 August 2022 Date of orders: 18 August 2022 Decision date: 18 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Griffiths AJ Decision: (1) The summons filed on 3 February 2022 is dismissed. (2) The plaintiff pay the first defendant's costs, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of medical assessment by Appeal Panel – judicial review of appeal panel decision – assessment of whole person impairment – whether methodology employed by Appeal Panel in rounding was incorrect – adequacy of reasons of Appeal Panel WORKERS COMPENSATION – proceedings before Commission – medical assessment of whole person impairment – psychological injury – appeal Legislation Cited: Accident Compensation Act 1985 (Vic) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ballas v Department of Education (NSW) (2020) 102 NSWLR 783; [2020] NSWCA 86 Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Lancaster v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 929 Robbie v Strasburger Enterprises Pty Ltd t/as Quix Food Stores [2017] NSWSC 363 Ryder v Sundance Bakehouse [2015] NSWSC 526 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 487; [2013] HCA 43 Texts Cited: American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (5th ed, 2001) State Insurance Regulatory Authority, NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (4th ed, reissued 1 March 2021) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Kempe (Plaintiff) Complete Community Services Pty Ltd (First Defendant) The President of the Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales (Second Defendant) Member R J Perrignon, Dr Julian Parmegiani and Dr Douglas Andrews as an Appeal Panel constituted under section 328 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: E G Romaniuk SC, E E Grotte (Plaintiff) C Roberts (First defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate