NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Williams [2022] NSWSC 1097 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 18 August 2022 Decision date: 18 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: The application is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — costs — costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) — applicant acquitted after jury trial — whether proceedings instituted reasonably — lengthy period of investigation — causation and self-defence left to jury — proceedings not instituted unreasonably Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 ss 2, 3, 3A, 4 Crimes Act 1900 ss 418, 421 Cases Cited: Mordaunt v DPP (NSW) [2007] NSWCA 121 Texts Cited: Not applicable Category: Costs Parties: The Crown Clinton Brian Williams (Applicant) Representation: Counsel: G Harrison / J Mehta (Crown) S Lawrence (Applicant)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Lloyd Law (Applicant) File Number(s): 2020/308240 Publication restriction: Not applicable
Judgment 1. On 2 June 2022, Clinton Brian Williams ("the applicant") was acquitted by a jury of murder and, in the alternative, manslaughter. 2. After the jury returned with their verdict of not guilty, the applicant applied for a certificate under s 3 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 ("the Act"). 3. I directed that the parties put on any additional evidence they wished to rely upon in respect of the application, and any submissions. They did so and, having considered that material, I determined on 4 July 2022 that no oral hearing was required in this matter. 4. These are my reasons for judgment on the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate