NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Misan v Markham Real Estate Partners (KSW) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWCA 155 Hearing dates: 11 August 2022, written submissions 12 and 15 August 2022 Decision date: 18 August 2022 Before: Leeming JA Decision: Orders made during the hearing on 11 August 2022: 1. Paragraph 15 of the notice to produce dated 8 July 2022 issued to the appellant by the respondent is set aside. 2. Paragraphs 1-6 inclusive, 8, 9 and 11 of the subpoena issued by the respondent to Mr Timothy James O'Connor returnable on 20 July 2022 be set aside. Order made on 18 August 2022: Order that the appellant's costs of the notices of motion dated 19 July 2022 and 11 August 2022, which are to be paid by the respondent in accordance with order 3 made on 11 August 2022, are payable on an indemnity basis. Catchwords: PRACTICE – appeals – stay of execution pending appeal – subpoena and notice to produce issued by respondent opposing stay of execution – notice sought production of costs estimate of appeal –production of documents bearing on financial position of appellant's partner – documents of no apparent relevance COSTS – indemnity costs – unfounded opposition to stay of execution on terms – significance of s 56 of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) – insignificance of respondent's broader commercial interests – indemnity costs ordered Legislation Cited: Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW), s 174 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Cases Cited: Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak; Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Najem (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 130 Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 Bank Nationalisation case (1949) 79 CLR 497 Cook v Pasminco Pty Ltd (No 2) (2000) 107 FCR 44 CSR Ltd v Eddy (2008) 70 NSWLR 725; [2008] NSWCA 83 Misan v Markham Real Estate Partners (KSW) Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 154 Rinehart v Welker (2012) 83 NSWLR 347; [2012] NSWCA 1 Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Paul Gerald Henry Misan (Appellant/Applicant) Markham Real Estate Partners (KSW) Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Horobin (Applicant) E Hyde (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate