Ugur v Public Guardian [2022] NSWCATAD 279

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ugur v Public Guardian [2022] NSWCATAD 279 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 19 August 2022 Decision date: 19 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: 1. Pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 a hearing of the dismissal application is dispensed with. 2. Pursuant to section 55(1) (b) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the proceedings are dismissed because they are misconceived. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Guardianship – Decision of Public Guardian – Review under 80A – whether internal review – application for extension of time to bring application - whether proceedings futile – whether misconceived and/or lacking in substance Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Guardianship Act 1987 Guardianship Regulation 2016 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Cervantes [2012] NSWCA 244; 61 MVR 443 BKW v Department of Family and Community Services [2014] NSWCATAD 205 DWZ v Wandiyali [2019] NSWCATAD 190 DYH v Public Guardian (No 3) [2022] NSWCATAP 34 Gamester Pty Ltd v Lockhart (1993) 112 ALR 623 Jackson v Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22 Long v Metromix Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCATAP 198 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369; (2007) 71NSWLR 61 University of New South Wales v McGuirk (No 1) (GD) [2005] NSWADTAP 65 Zonnevylle v Information Commissioner [2021] NSWCATAD 366 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Haci Emin Orhan Ugur (Applicant) Public Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00063208 Publication restriction: Nil