NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: LUC DAIGLE v SCT OPERATIONS PTY LIMITED [2022] NSWDC 365 Hearing dates: 3 August 2022 4 August 2022 Date of orders: 4 August 2022 Decision date: 04 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Montgomery DCJ Decision: (1) I determine that the New South Wales District Court has jurisdiction to hear all matters pleaded. Catchwords: PROCEEDURAL RULINGS – Equitable Jurisdiction of the District Court of NSW PROMISORY ESTOPPEL – s 134(1)(h) District Court Act 1973 (NSW) REASONABLE NOTICE OF TERMINATION – Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Ss 12; 117; 539; 562 Legislation Cited: District Court Act 1973 (NSW) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Cases Cited: Combe v Combe [1951] 1 All ER 767; [1951] 2 KB 215 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Hadfield (2001) 53 NSWLR 614; [2001] NSWCA 440 Great Northern Developments Pty Ltd v Lane [2021] NSWCA 150 NUW v Davids (1999) 91 FCR 513 Abbe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 162 ALR 1; [1999] HCA 14 Texts Cited: Estoppel by Conduct and Election, Thomson, Sweet & Maxwell, 2006 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Luc Daigle, Plaintiff/cross defendant SCT Operations Pty Limited, Defendant/cross claimant Representation: Counsel: Ms Kumar, Counsel for the plaintiff/cross defendant Mr Latham, Counsel for the defendant/cross claimant
Solicitors: File Number(s): 2021/00173343
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate