NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kendrovski v Ardent Leisure Ltd t/as D'Albora Marinas [2022] NSWSC 1114 Hearing dates: 18 August 2022 Date of orders: 22 August 2022 Decision date: 22 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Schmidt AJ Decision: Leave to permit reliance on further expert report refused. Production of specified documents required. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Notice to produce — relevance — legitimate forensic purpose — Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 — expert opinion — documents relevant to testing validity of conclusion expert arrived at — consequences of required production — documents must be produced CIVIL PROCEDURE — Notice of motion — leave to rely on expert report sought — case management principles — explanation for delay in application to lead further expert evidence unsatisfactory — Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 31.19, 31.20 — litigation not to be conducted by ambush or surprise — consequences of grant of leave unjust — leave refused Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 31.19, 31.20, 34, 34.2 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2019/278990 Jimmy Kendrovski (Plaintiff)
2018/33987 Anita Simonovski (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate