NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Shogroup Hotels Pty Ltd v Harris Street Holdings Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1119 Hearing dates: 10 August 2022 Date of orders: 24 August 2022 Decision date: 24 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Proceedings dismissed. Catchwords: CONTRACTS – interpretation – lease – deed of variation of lease – where deed provided that the lessor and lessee are to "meet to discuss and agree" upon reductions to rent in circumstances where COVID-19 lockdowns affected the lessee's business – where lessor and lessee negotiated pursuant to the deed but were unable to agree upon a rent reduction – whether the obligation to "discuss and agree" is unenforceable as an agreement to agree – whether the uncertainty and incompleteness inherent in the obligation may nevertheless be overcome by the "machinery" provisions contained in the dispute resolution provisions of the lease – held that the mere failure of the parties to reach an agreement is not a dispute that falls within the scope of the dispute resolution provisions – held that obligation to "discuss and agree" rent reductions pursuant to the deed is unenforceable as an agreement to agree Legislation Cited: Conveyancing (General) Regulation 2018 (NSW), sch 5 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld) Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 600 Ecosse Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Gee Dee Nominees Pty Ltd (2017) 261 CLR 544; [2017] HCA 12 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Godecke v Kirwan (1973) 129 CLR 629 May & Butcher Ltd v The King [1934] 2 KB 17 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104; [2015] HCA 37 Price v Spoor (2021) 270 CLR 450; [2021] HCA 20 Strzelecki Holdings Pty Ltd v Cable Sands Pty Ltd (2010) 41 WAR 318; [2010] WASCA 222 United Group Rail Services Ltd v Rail Corporation New South Wales (2009) 74 NSWLR 618; [2009] NSWCA 177 Texts Cited: Heydon, JD, Heydon on Contract (Lawbook Co, 2019) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shogroup Hotels Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Harris Street Holdings Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Dr C J Birch SC (Plaintiff) Mr J S Burnett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate