NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lending 001 Pty Ltd v Dimarti [2022] NSWSC 1136 Hearing dates: 25 August 2022 Date of orders: 25 August 2022 Decision date: 29 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Judgment for the plaintiff for possession of the land comprised in folio identifier 120/10707 being the land situated at and known as 43 Monterey St, Monterey NSW 2217. 2. The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs. Catchwords: MORTGAGES AND SECURITIES - mortgages – rights and remedies of mortgagee – possession – plaintiff seeking summary judgment for possession of land – no dispute between parties that principal sum is owing under mortgage – substance of dispute is amount owing – plaintiff seeking possession and not any amount outstanding – judgment for plaintiff CIVIL PROCEDURE – summary disposal – judgment for plaintiff – defences claimed predatory practices, relief under Contracts Review Act (CRA) and breach of National Credit Code – no material facts pleaded to support reliance on CRA and Code - repeated deficient pleading by debtors to particularise defences – whether summary judgment appropriate where defence relies on CRA - whether defences should be struck out – where no substantive defence demonstrated - plaintiff entitled to summary judgment Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 58 Consumer Credit (New South Wales) Code Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) s 9 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 12 National Credit Code Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) s 57 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 13.1, 14.28, 15.3 Cases Cited: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Bragg (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 208 Chalak v G & G Mikhael Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 116 Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd v Pollard [1983] 1 NSWLR 74 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v MLD Financial Services & Management Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1476 Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Limited (1983) 154 CLR 87; [1983] HCA 25 Fitzgerald v Watson [2011] NSWSC 736 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Michalopoulos v Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited [2010] NSWSC 1450 Morlend Finance Corporation (Vic) Pty Ltd v Westendorp [1993] 2 VR 284 O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia Ltd [2013] NSWCA 71 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Bowie [2015] NSWSC 328 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389 Texts Cited: Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies (5th Edition 2014 Lexis Nexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lending 001 Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Carmelo Dimarti (First Defendant) Margherita Dimarti (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Silver (Plaintiff) In person (First Defendant) J Pope (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate