NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sheppard v Smith [2022] NSWCA 167 Hearing dates: 8 June 2022 Date of orders: 29 August 2022 Decision date: 29 August 2022 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Beech-Jones JA at [2]; Basten AJA at [103] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed. (2) The Appellants pay the Respondents' costs of the Appeal. Catchwords: EASEMENTS – application to extinguish right of way – s 89(1) Conveyancing Act – adjacent properties – obsolescence – right of way granted in 1885 in unlimited terms – purposes included, but not limited to, removal of "nightsoil"– right of way fell into disuse after sewers connected in 1908 – no error in primary judge's finding that easement should not be deemed obsolete EASEMENTS – abandonment – title to dominant tenement became indefeasible in 2010 – owners took 'active steps' to include right of way on title – servient tenement not part of appellants' property until possessory title approved in 2019 – title granted subject to right of way fence erected between properties preventing access – garden bed and fishpond built on servient tenement – after grant of indefeasible title dominant tenement owners built new fence, shed and wall impeding access to right of way – owners of servient tenement replaced garden bed and fishpond with wall – extended room over right of way – whether intention to abandon easement should be inferred – non‑user and building of non-permanent obstacles thereafter did not establish abandonment EASEMENTS – substantial injury – continued existence of easement would secure practical benefit to owners of dominant tenement – no error in primary judge's finding that it was not shown that extinguishment would not substantially injure the owners of the dominant tenement – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 89 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 28U and 28V Cases Cited: Ashoil Holdings Pty Ltd v Fassoulas (2005) 12 BPR 98195; [2005] NSWCA 80 Chiu v Healey [2003] NSWSC 857 Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Cavacourt Pty Ltd (2000) 10 BPR 18,099; [2000] NSWCA 28 Gotobed v Pridmore (Court of Appeal (UK), 16 December 1970, unrep) Pieper v Edwards [1982] 1 NSWLR 336 Proprietors Strata Plan 9,968 v Proprietors Strata Plan 11,173 [1979] 2 NSWLR 605 Re Mason and the Conveyancing Act [1962] NSWR 762; (1960) 78 WN (NSW) 925 Sheppard v Smith [2021] NSWSC 1207 Swan v Sinclair [1924] 1 Ch 254 Swan v Sinclair [1925] AC 227 Treweeke v 36 Wolseley Road Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 274; [1973] HCA 27 Williams v Usherwood (1983) 45 P & CR 235 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dean Frederick Sheppard (First Appellant) Meredith Jane Chapman (Second Appellant) Dean Clayton Smith (First Respondent) Emma Jane Munro (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr GA Sirtes SC; Mr G Marsden (Appellants) Mr JM Ireland QC (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate