NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sydney Hoist and Scaffolding Pty Ltd v Diamond Sons Pty Ltd t/as Two Visions [2022] NSWDC 377 Hearing dates: 25 August 2022 Date of orders: 29 August 2022 Decision date: 29 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Abadee DCJ Decision: See paragraph 86 Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to enforce settlement agreement – scope of discretion - whether an inferior court, with limited equitable jurisdiction, can exercise discretion to take into account equitable principles to refuse enforcement of a compromise - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 73 CONTRACTS – time stipulation for payments expressed to be essential – whether on its proper construction, payments to be made within reasonable time – whether implied term permits late payment for unforeseen circumstances EVIDENCE – application for summary enforcement of compromise – opposition to application raises questions of construction – defendant relies upon hearsay evidence of representations made by an overseas witness – whether missing witness 'not available' - whether 'proceeding' is 'interlocutory' - whether hearsay evidence admissible – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 61(1), 63(2), 75 Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56 – 60, 73, 98, 100 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 134 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 61, 63, 75, 192 Law Reform (Law and Equity) Act 1972 (NSW) ss 6, 7 Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570 Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (No.3) (1996) 64 FCR 55 Armada Balnaves Pte Ltd v Woodside Energy Julimar Pty Ltd [2022] WASCA 69 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Brickles v Snell [1916] 2 AC 599 Candy v GIO General Ltd [2013] NSWSC 810 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 337 Hoad v Swan (1920) 28 CLR 258 Hobhouse v Macarthur – Onslow [2022] NSWCA 158 Jingalong Pty Ltd v Todd [2015] NSWCA 7 Katter v Melhem (2015) 90 NSWLR 164 Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 104 Reid v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2022] NSWCA 134 Stickney v Kibble [1915] AC 386 at 419 Sunbird Plaza Proprietary Limited v Maloney and Another (1989)166 CLR 245 Tsang Chi Ming v Uvanna Pty Ltd (t/as North West Immigration Services) (1996) 140 ALR 273 United Scientific v Burnley Borough Council [1978] AC 904 Yule v Smith [2013] NSWSC 209 Zivkovic & Ors v Parke [2022] VSCA 43 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure NSW (LexisNexis electronic version) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sydney Hoist and Scaffolding Pty Ltd (ABN 38 117 792 149) (applicant) Diamond Sons Pty Ltd t/as Two Visions (ABN 53 609 503 139) (respondent) Representation: Mr S Stanton (Counsel) for the respondent Mr S Ivanstoff (solicitor) for the applicant File Number(s): 2020/00236081 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate