NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Le v Angius [2022] NSWSC 1150 Hearing dates: 10 June 2022 Date of orders: 30 August 2022 Decision date: 30 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Richmond J Decision: The notice of motion is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS — legal practitioners — solicitors — former client — where there is insufficient evidence to engage court's supervisory jurisdiction to restrain legal practitioners from acting to preserve confidential information — whether solicitors should be restrained from acting for the protection of the administration of justice Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 63, 69 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 57(1), 59(1),100 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 17.2, 17.3 Cases Cited: Carindale Country Club Estate Pty Ltd v Astill (1993) 42 FCR 307 Indjic v Stojanovic [2020] NSWSC 470 Italiano v Lake [2015] VSC 189 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561; [2005] NSWSC 1181 Koellner v Spicer [2019] NSWSC 1571 Mitchell v Burrell [2008] NSWSC 772 Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (a firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC Eq 7 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Thi Quy Le (Plaintiff) Jenny Angius (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr L Ellison SC (Plaintiff) Ms E Picker (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate