NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Franklin Yeezy Holdings atf Franklin Yeezy Holdings Trust v Paligaru (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1165 Hearing dates: On the papers; submissions received 1, 22 and 25 August 2022 Date of orders: 31 August 2022 Decision date: 31 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Real Property List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Respondent to pay first defendant's costs of its application to set aside judgment Catchwords: COSTS – where respondent joined as contradictor to first defendant's application to set aside judgment – where respondent's evidence revealed reason why judgment should be set aside – whether respondent should pay first defendant's costs of the application Cases Cited: Franklin Yeezy Holdings atf Franklin Yeezy Holdings Trust v Paligaru [2022] NSWSC 933 Category: Costs Parties: Franklin Yeezy Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 619 006 272 as trustee for Franklin Yeezy Holdings Trust (Plaintiff) Ralph Ignatius Paligaru (Applicant/First Defendant) Amreeta Devi Paligaru (Second Defendant) National Australia Bank Ltd (Third Defendant) Reliance Leasing Pty Ltd (Fourth Defendant) DCP Litigation Holdings Pty Ltd (Fifth Defendant) Mark James Smith (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A E Maroya (Applicant/First Defendant) D C Eardley (Respondent)
Solicitors: Mahony Law (Applicant/First Defendant) Moscardo Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/216549
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate