NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Rahman [2022] NSWCATOD 98 Hearing dates: 21,22,23 February 2022 and 11 April 2022 Date of orders: 2 September 2022 Decision date: 02 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Stevenson ADCJ, Principal Member Dr J Aitken, Senior Member Dr H Bittar, Senior Member Dr C Berglund, General Member Decision: (1) The Tribunal finds that the Practitioner is guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct. (2) The Tribunal finds that the Practitioner is guilty of professional misconduct. (3) The proceedings are adjourned to a date to be fixed for directions with respect to the hearing of Stage 2. (4) The costs of the proceedings are reserved. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS — Medical Practitioners — misconduct and discipline — unsatisfactory professional conduct — professional misconduct Legislation Cited: Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) Cases Cited: A v N [2012] NSWSC 354 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] CLR 336 Campbell v Campbell [2015] NSWSC 784 HCCC v Boulton [2021] NSWCATOD 160 HCCC v Nguyen [2018] NSWCATOD168 The Queen v Byrnes (1995) 183 CLR 501 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Bassel Abdul Rahman (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Aitken (Applicant) P Dwyer (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate