NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: T v South Western Sydney Local Health District [2022] NSWSC 1173 Hearing dates: 25 July and 5 August 2022 and written submissions Decision date: 02 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Lindsay J Decision: Subject to allowing the parties an opportunity to be heard as to the form of the orders to be made, and costs, orders are to be made for a community treatment order affecting the plaintiff to be revoked. Catchwords: MENTAL HEALTH – Mental Health Review Tribunal – Appeal – Community Treatment Order – Forced medication by depot injection – Availability of other care of a less restrictive kind – Oral medication in lieu of depot injection – Consideration of whether oral medication consistent with safe and effective care, appropriate and reasonably available to affected person Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Guardianship Act 1987 NSW Mental Health Act 2007 NSW – sections 51, 53, 163, 164 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: CCR v PS (No 2) (1986) 6 NSWLR 622 Harry v Mental Health Review Tribunal (1994) 33 NSWLR 315 J v Lieschke (1987) 162 CLR 447 Re Eve (1986) 2 SCR 388 Re Frieda and Geoffrey [2009] NSWSC 133; 40 Fam LR 608 Re Victoria [2002] NSWSC 647; 29 Fam LR 157 Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 S v South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service [2010] NSWSC 178 Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (Marion's Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218 Z v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2015] NSWCA 373 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: T, a mentally ill person Defendant: South Western Sydney Local Health District Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: AG Barwick, Solicitor Defendant: E Holmes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate