NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Trinvass Pty Ltd and Anor v Connect Infrastructure Design Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 394 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13, 14 and 28 July 2022; 2 September 2022 Date of orders: 2 September 2022 Decision date: 02 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Weber SC DCJ Decision: (1) That there be judgment and verdict for the defendant. (2) That the plaintiffs pay the defendant's costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION — Contract — Implied terms — Australian Consumer Law CONSUMER LAW — False or misleading representations — Representations about goods or services Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law, ss 18 and 60 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Taxation v Sara Lee Household & Body Care (Australia) Pty Ltd (2000) 201 CLR 520 Demagogue Pty Limited v Ramensky (1993) 39 FCR 31 General Newspapers Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation (1993) 45 FCR 164 McWilliam's Wines Pty Ltd v LS Booth Wine Transport Pty Ltd (1992) 25 NSWLR 723 Category: Principal judgment Parties: First Plaintiff: Trinvass Pty Ltd (ACN 074 094 063) Second Plaintiff: Kelaron Pty Ltd (ACN 073 975 416) Defendant: Connect Infrastructure Design Pty Ltd (ACN 102 482 271) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiffs: Mr A E Hopkins Defendant: Mr S E Gray
Solicitors: Plaintiffs: Reuben George Lawyers Defendant: Clyde & Co File Number(s): 2020/266796 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate