NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Capital Access Pty Ltd v Charnwood Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1185 Hearing dates: 26 August 2022 Date of orders: 26 August 2022 Decision date: 06 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: Leave for the issue of a writ of restitution to restore to the Plaintiff possession of the land comprised in folio identifier 36/8011 of the Register known as 184 Carrington Avenue, Hurstville NSW 2220. Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – enforcement – writs of restitution – when available - where writ of possession issued to plaintiff – plaintiff agreed to postpone execution of writ for six-week period to allow third defendant to refinance debt – no contact made with sheriff and writ executed – third defendant subsequently permitted to re-occupy the property – where third defendant did not repay debt by agreed date and did not deliver up possession of the property – whether plaintiff should be granted leave for issue of a writ of restitution – where third defendant did not trespass to regain possession – whether sufficient nexus between original recovery of possession and need to effect further recovery of same land – clear nexus – writ of restitution granted to plaintiff to recover the same possession Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 13, 56 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 39.1 Cases Cited: Abram v National Australia Bank Ltd (Unreported, 1 May 1997, NSWCA) Alliance Building Society v Austin [1951] 2 All ER 1068 at 1070; 2 TLR 1231 Doe, on Demise of Pate v Roe (1807) 1 Taunt 55 Haniotis v Dimitriou [1983] VR 498 Lacon v de Groat (1894) 10 TLR 24; [1894] 1 WLUK 11 Maher v Commonwealth Bank of Australia & Ors (No 2) [2004] FCA 1398; (2004) 211 ALR 656 Perpetual Limited v Kelso [2008] NSWSC 906 Wilkshire County Council & Ors v Frazer (1985) 52 P&C R 46 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Capital Access Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Charnwood Constrictions Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Ayman Elgammal (Second Defendant) Ahmed Elgammal (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Helvadjian (Plaintiff) No appearances (First, Second and Third Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate