NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brylewski v Maclean [2022] NSWSC 1193 Hearing dates: 26 August 2022 Date of orders: 26 August 2022 Decision date: 08 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Set down for hearing before a judge of the Court on 28 November 2022 with an estimate of one day. 2. Notice of Motion filed by the first defendant on 6 June 2022 is fixed for hearing on 28 November 2022 if the trial judge considers it appropriate to hear it. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Possession List – deed entered into by plaintiffs and third defendant transferring half interest to plaintiffs – no challenge to validity of deed until proceedings commenced 8 years later – first defendant wife of third defendant and occupier of property – where no orders sought against third defendant - third defendant died after proceedings commenced – first defendant sought to be appointed to represent deceased's estate – rr 7.8., 7.9, 7.10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules – where third defendant was subject to guardianship and financial management orders in favour of Public Guardian and NSW Trustee and Guardian – where Court had been informed there was to be contested application for letters of administration – inappropriate to appoint first defendant as representative of the estate until probate proceedings resolved - where challenge to deed unrelated to possession proceedings – further delay of possession proceedings not consistent with s 56 Civil Procedure Act Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) s 12 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 Cases Cited: Government Insurance Office v Johnson [1981] 2 NSWLR 617 Hanshaw v National Australia Bank Ltd [2012] NSWCA 100; (2012) 264 FLR 294 Stedman v O'Hearn [2006] NSWSC 1122; Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Maria Brylewski (First Plaintiff) Tadeusz Brylewski (Second Plaintiff) Jacqueline Maclean (First Defendant) David Raynor (Second Defendant) Emil Radecki (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Bennett (Plaintiffs) C Adamson (First Defendant) No appearance (Second Defendant) No appearance (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate