NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: COLOURRENDER (AUSTRALIA) Pty Ltd v Sarkis [2022] NSWCATAP 291 Hearing dates: 12 & 19 August 2022 Date of orders: 19 August 2022 Decision date: 08 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member Decision: (1) Pending further order of the Appeal Panel, order 2 made in the proceeding at first instance is effective only to the extent of requiring the appellant to pay the respondent the sum of $64,000.00. (2) The Application for a Stay is otherwise dismissed. (3) The appellant has leave to renew its application for a stay in respect of the award of costs at first instance in the event that it is required to lodge a response to a costs assessment application, in respect of those costs, prior to determination of the appeal. (4) The appellant is to pay the respondents' costs of the application for a stay, fixed in the sum of $8500.00 For the avoidance of doubt, this order incorporates the costs ordered on 12 August 2022 at order 15, and the costs are payable immediately. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a stay – need for evidence to substantiate allegation appeal may be rendered nugatory due to liquidation of appellant company if judgment enforced – need for thorough and candid disclosure of financial position Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) Cases Cited: Beck v Colonial Staff Super Pty Ltd and Ors (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1360 Bentran v Sabbarton [2014] NSWCATAP 37 Cockle v Isaksen (1957) 99 CLR 155 at 161; [1957] HCA 85 Cook's Constructions v Stork Food Systems Aust Pty Ltd [2008] QCA 322 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; [1986] HCA 33 Diao v Rawson Homes Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 273 Federated Amalgamated Government Railway and Tramway Service Association v The New South Wales Railway Traffic Employees' Association (1906) 4 CLR 488 at 493-495; [1906] HCA 94 McMillan v Coolah Tourist Park Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 73 Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 59 ALJR 481; [1985] HCA 28 New South Wales Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 95 Penrith Whitewater Stadium Ltd v Lesvos Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 103 SAS Trustee Corporation v Rossetti [2018] NSWCA 68 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: COLOURRENDER (AUSTRALIA) Pty Ltd (Appellant) George Sarkis (First Respondent) Sonya Sarkis (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Luitingh (Appellant) R Zikmann (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate