NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kalloghlian v Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] NSWSC 1201 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 08 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Peden J Decision: The respondents' application for a special costs order is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: COSTS — Party/Party — Application for costs on an indemnity basis — Whether indemnity costs should be ordered — No basis for finding the motion had no prospects of success COSTS — Application for a gross sum costs order — Whether a gross sum costs order should be made — Issue whether costs assessment would be delayed — No basis for such a delay Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98 Cases Cited: Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 12 Harrison v Schipp (2002) 54 NSWLR 738 Hillebrand v Penrith Council [2000] NSWSC 1058 Kalloghlian v Mity Lawyers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1071 Re Indoor Climate Technologies Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 356 Saba v Plumb [2017] NSWSC 955 Category: Costs Parties: Avedis Kalloghlian (Plaintiff/Applicant) Mitry Lawyers Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Richard Louis Mitry (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Sperber (Solicitor) (Plaintiff/Applicant) A Haslam (Solicitor) (First and Second Respondent)
Solicitors: TPS & Co (Plaintiff/Applicant) Gilchrist Connell (First and Second Respondent) File Number(s): 2019/75533 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate