NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2022] NSWCA 176 Hearing dates: 8 September 2022 (on the papers) Decision date: 09 September 2022 Before: Gleeson JA Decision: Application for recusal declined Catchwords: JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – Court of Appeal – bias – apprehended bias on the ground of prejudgment – where members of the Court sat on previous unsuccessful applications by the applicant Cases Cited: British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie (2011) 242 CLR 283; [2011] HCA 2 CNY17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2019) 268 CLR 78; [2019] HCA 50 Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577; [2006] HCA 55 Ebner v The Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337; [2000] HCA 63 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls (2011) 244 CLR 427; [2011] HCA 48 Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2020] NSWCA 295 Quach v New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission; Quach v New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2017] NSWCA 267 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342; [1986] HCA 39 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Michael Quach (Applicant) NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (First Respondent) NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate