NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ramsey v R [2022] NSWCCA 197 Hearing dates: 29 July 2022 Date of orders: 12 September 2022 Decision date: 12 September 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL Wilson J Fagan J Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal against conviction. (2) Dismiss the appeal against conviction. (3) Leave to appeal against sentence refused. Catchwords: CRIME — appeals — appeal against conviction — miscarriage of justice – unreasonable verdicts – new evidence – no error or miscarriage of justice shown – verdict not unreasonable – appeal against sentence – special circumstances – whether error in consideration of appellant's subjective circumstances – manifest excess – no error shown – sentence not excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; [2000] HCA 54 Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392; [1986] HCA 26 Lawless v The Queen (1979) 142 CLR 659; [1979] HCA 49 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259; [1989] HCA 35 R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356; (2004) 149 A Crim R 417 Ratten v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Ramsey (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Self-represented (applicant) C Curtis (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate