NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Chapman Planning Pty Limited v The Council of the City of Sydney [2022] NSWLEC 1481 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 August 2022 Date of orders: 12 September 2022 Decision date: 12 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: McEwen AC Decision: The Court orders: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development consent no. D/2016/917 for the continued extension of trading hours at 16 O'Connell Street, Sydney, legally described as Lot 1 in SP55932 is modified in the terms set out at Annexure 'A'. (3) Development consent D/2016/917 for the continued extension of trading hours at 16 O'Connell Street, Sydney, legally described as Lot 1 in SP55932 as modified by the Court is set out at Annexure 'B'. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – continued extension of trading hours - conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.15, 4.55, 8.9, 8.10 Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 121B Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 34 Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Limited (1998) 43 NSWLR 468 Sydney City Council v Ilenace Pty Limited (1984) 3 NSWLR 414 Vacik Pty Limited v Penrith City Council 24 February 1992, unreported Texts Cited: Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Chapman Planning Pty Limited (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A. Adams (Solicitor) (Applicant) A. Singh (Solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate