NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Australian Mortgage Finance Services Pty Ltd v Murabito [2022] NSWSC 1226 Hearing dates: 9 September 2022 Decision date: 09 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Duty List Before: Meek J Decision: Dismiss application to stay writ of possession with costs Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY — Possession of land — Application to stay execution of writ for possession — hearsay evidence of possible funding to pay judgment debt — Registered proprietors being two of three applicants are both bankrupt — Payment of judgment debt would not entitle any of applicants to possession of property which had vested in the respective trustees in bankruptcy — No evidence of extent of indebtedness of bankrupts' estates — No evidence trustees in bankruptcy aware of application or had given or promised to give any licence to applicants to remain in property — Application based on asserted health and hardship grounds — Attempts to secure alternative accommodation —Application on a Friday dismissed in context where mortgagee would request Sheriff not to act on writ until Monday afternoon PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — Initial ex parte application — Undertaking as to damages proffered by applicant without disclosure that he and another applicant were undischarged bankrupts — Material nondisclosure of a matter impacting upon decision to make stay ex parte prior to urgent contested stay application — Fact of bankruptcy ought to have been disclosed Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 58, 60 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 25.8 Cases Cited: GE Personal Finance Pty Ltd v Smith [2006] NSWSC 889 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Australian Mortgage Finance Services Pty Ltd ACN 643 981 27 as trustee for the Australian Mortgage Finance Services Fund (Plaintiff) Steven Samuel Murabito (First Defendant / First Applicant on Motion) Lila Stojcevksi (Second Defendant / Second Applicant on Motion) Representation: Counsel: B B Palmer (solicitor) (Plaintiff) L T Fermanis (Defendants) Solicitors: Summer Lawyers (Plaintiff) Evangelos Patakas & Associates (Defendants) File Number(s): 2020/309462
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate