NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wirth v Will [2022] NSWLEC 118 Hearing dates: 14 and 15 June, 6 and 7 September 2022 Date of orders: 15 September 2022 Decision date: 15 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [154] Catchwords: ENCROACHMENT - application pursuant to the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (the Act) for order to remove encroaching structure - cross-claim seeking grant of easements to retain and use structure - whether there is a single structure or two separate structures built at different times - only evidence is photographic - examination of photographs reveals, on the balance of probabilities, two structures not one - finding necessitates rejection of cross-claim - consideration of whether encroachment satisfies definition of a "building" in the Act - encroachment satisfies the definition giving power to order its removal - removal ordered COSTS - costs follow the event - Respondents ordered to pay Applicant's costs of the application and the cross-claim - earlier limited costs order in Respondents' favour preserved Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56 and 98(1) Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922, ss 2, 3 and 4 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 16(1A), 19 and 22 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 3.7 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development, cl 4(1)(a)(ii) Uniform Procedure Rules 2005, r 42.1 Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Barton Securities Limited v Warringah Council & Others (2009) 170 LGERA 223; [2009] NSWLEC 179 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R. 67 Kotselas v Doualetas (unreported, NSWLEC, 12 October 1993) Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Olivia Ross v Patrick Lane (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 121 Sze Tu v Lowe (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 91 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Wirth (Applicant/Cross‑Respondent) Aharon Will (First Respondent/Cross‑Claimant) Clare Will (Second Respondent/Cross‑Claimant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Lazarus SC (Applicant/Cross-respondent) Mr T Robertson SC (Respondents/Cross‑Claimants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate