NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Scott v Scott [2022] NSWCA 182 Hearing dates: 23 August 2022 Date of orders: 20 September 2022 Decision date: 20 September 2022 Before: Ward P at [1]; Meagher JA at [2]; Kirk JA at [91] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: SUCCESSION – family provision – claim by adult daughter for provision pursuant to Succession Act 2006 (NSW), s 59 – where deceased's 2019 will left family home to appellant daughter and small legacy to respondent daughter – where testamentary statement purported to justify 2019 will – where primary judge found will and statement obtained by process of manipulation and sourced to appellant – where earlier will of deceased leaving one-third of estate to each child found to reflect deceased's fair and considered testamentary judgment – whether primary judge erred in being satisfied that 2019 will did not make adequate provision for respondent's proper advancement Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), s 9(2) Succession Act 2006 (NSW), ss 59(1)(c), 59(2), 60(2) Cases Cited: Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Bassett v Bassett [2021] NSWCA 320 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 DJ Singh v DH Singh [2018] NSWCA 30 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services (2011) 243 CLR 361; [2011] HCA 11 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9; [1962] HCA 19 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201; [1994] HCA 40 Slack v Rogan; Palffy v Rogan (2013) 85 NSWLR 253; [2013] NSWSC 522 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191; [2005] HCA 11 Vukic v Luca Grbin; Estate of Zvonko Grbin [2006] NSWSC 41 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531; [1979] HCA 9 White v Barron (1980) 144 CLR 431; [1980] HCA 14 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Charlene Arnel Scott (Appellant) Coralynne April Scott (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R Wilson SC with L Clarke (Appellant) Dr C Birch SC with AF Stevens (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate