NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v He [2022] NSWSC 1260 Hearing dates: 24 August 2022 Date of orders: 24 August 2022 Decision date: 19 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Fagan J Decision: The first, second, third and fourth defendants' application for revocation of orders made by the Court on 6 October 2021 is dismissed. The said defendants are to pay the plaintiffs costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: CRIME – proceeds of crime – application to revoke restraining orders – whether it is in the interest of justice to revoke the orders – where the defendants' recorded interviews said to be unlawfully obtained Legislation Cited: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code (Cth) Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Kamal [2011] WASCA 55 Garrard v Email Furniture Pty Ltd (1993) 32 NSWLR 662 Saad v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2021] VSCA 246 Savcor Pty Ltd v Cathodic Protection International APS [2005] VSCA 213 Strickland v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (2018) 266 CLR 325; [2018] HCA 53 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (plaintiff/respondent) Wenfang He (defendant/applicant) Representation: Counsel: G O'Manoney with D Habashby (plaintiff/respondent) S Duggan (defendant/applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate