NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: He v R (Cth) [2022] NSWCCA 205 Hearing dates: 29 July 2022 Date of orders: 23 September 2022 Decision date: 23 September 2022 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [1] Wilson J at [1] Fagan J at [1] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – Appeals – Appeal against sentence – possession of tobacco products imported to defraud the revenue – asserted failure to consider parity – whether justifiable sense of grievance – asserted failure to take applicant's antecedents into account – whether some other sentence warranted Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Cases Cited: Crystal Lee England v R; Sackda Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; (2010) 77 NSWLR 540 Martellotta v R [2021] NSWCCA 168 McMullen v R [2013] NSWCCA 261 Narayan v R [2022] NSWCCA 163 R (Cth) v Jia Li He (No 1) [2021] NSWDC 450 R (Cth) v Jia Li He (No 3) [2021] NSWDC 770 R (Cth) v Su (District Court (NSW), Noman SC, 14 September 2021, unrep) R v Zhang [2017] SASCFC 5 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jia Li He The Queen Representation: Counsel: G Smith SC/A Parsons (Applicant) R Ranken (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate