NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Vujica v TNM Roofing Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 305 Hearing dates: 15 August 2022 Date of orders: 20 September 2022 Decision date: 20 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Deputy President G Blake AM SC, Senior Member Decision: 1. Orders 2 and 3 made on 19 May 2022 in applications HB 21/52061 and HB 21/49598 are set aside. 2. The proceedings are remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division for redetermination in accordance with these reasons and according to law by a differently constituted Tribunal. 3. The respondent is to repay to the appellants the amount of $12,872.00, such amount to be paid within seven days from the date of these orders. 4. The Tribunal may permit such further evidence as the Tribunal considers appropriate Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) – Enforceability of contract – requirement for writing – whether non-compliance with s 7 requirements renders contact unenforceable by contractor EVIDENCE – admissibility where rules of evidence do not apply – Procedural Direction 3 – Expert Evidence – failure to sign and date report – procedural fairness Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law (NSW), s 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 26, 38, 80, 81, Sch 4 cl 12 Evidence Act 2005 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), s 79O Home Building Act 1989 (NSW), ss 4, 7, 7AA, 7A, 10, Sch 2 cl 1 Home Building Regulation 2014 (NSW), reg 5 Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provision) Act (No 2) 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anjoul v Anjoul [2021] NSWSC 592 Beechwood Homes v Kirkpatrick & Ors [2002] NSWSC 87 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503; [2012] HCA 55 Forster v Hunter New England Area Health Service (2010) 77 NSWLR 495; [2010] NSWCA 106 Italiano v Carbone & Ors [2005] NSWCA 177 Khan v Kang [2014] NSWCATAP 48 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705; [2001] NSWCA 305 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221; [1987] HCA 5 Pownall v Conlon Management Pty Ltd (1995) 12 WAR 370; (1995) 16 ACSR 227 Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 35; [1998] HCA 28 Wright v Foresight Constructions Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 327 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 2 July 2001 Procedural Direction 3 - Expert Evidence Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stipo Vujica (First Appellant) Blazenka Vujica (Second Appellant) TNM Roofing Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Appellants (Self Represented) File Number(s): 2022/00175955 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 19 May 2022 Before: J Levingston, General Member File Number(s): HB 21/52061; HB 21/49598
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate