NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tourist Accommodation Pty Ltd v Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority [2022] NSWSC 1277 Hearing dates: 7 September 2022 Date of orders: 26 September 2022 Decision date: 26 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Griffiths AJ Decision: The further amended summons is dismissed, with costs. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Ground of review other than procedural fairness – Constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction – Whether defendant Authority misconstrued evidence – Whether applications determined on the basis of an incorrect factual assumption ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Procedural fairness – Hearing rule – Disclosure – Whether defendant Authority required to disclose deliberative processes ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Ground of review other than procedural fairness – Irrelevant and relevant considerations – Statutory construction ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Hardiman principle – Role of the defendant Authority as the active contradictor – No impropriety Legislation Cited: Casino Control Act 1992 (NSW) Gaming and Liquor Administration Act 2007 (NSW) Gaming Machines Act 2001 (NSW) Gaming Machines Regulation 2019 (NSW) Liquor Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Commissioner for the Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cunneen v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2014] NSWCA 421 Henroth Investments Pty Ltd v Sydney North Planning Panel [2019] NSWCA 68 Murlan Consulting Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Municipal Council [2009] NSWCA 300 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 12; [1980] HCA 13 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63 Texts Cited: Macquarie Dictionary (8th ed, 2020) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tourist Accommodation Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: W G Muddle SC (Plaintiff) S Patterson (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate