NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Sunnyside Accountants [2022] NSWSC 1313 Hearing dates: 24 March 2022 Date of orders: 29 September 2022 Decision date: 29 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Williams J Decision: See [75] below. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – adoption of referee's report – whether report included certain findings – whether certain opinions and recommendations expressed by the referee were extraneous to the scope of the reference Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 20.24 Cases Cited: Chocolate Factory Apartments v Westpoint Finance [2005] NSWSC 784 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (1982) 149 CLR 337; [1982] HCA 62 Texts Cited: N/A Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sunnyside Accountants Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Wasala Mudiyanselage Charitha Prasanna Wasala (Second Plaintiff) Keith Mar (First Defendant) Nancy Pik Yuk Lam (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R Raffell (Second Plaintiff) M Young SC (Defendants)
Solicitors: Sarvaas Ciappara Lawyers (Second Plaintiff) Dixon Holmes Lawyers (Defendants) File Number(s): 2021/62300 Publication restriction: N/A
Judgment
Introduction 1. These reasons concern whether the Court should adopt the report of a referee in whole or in part and what order should then be made concerning the outstanding claim for relief in the proceedings that was the subject matter of the reference.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate