NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Brady v Mikan (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1320 Hearing dates: Written submissions 1, 2 August and 1 September 2022; 13 September 2022 Date of orders: 29 September 2022 Decision date: 29 September 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Kunc J Decision: See paragraph [51] Catchwords: SUCCESSION – Probate and administration – Costs – Where probate issues not the only matters in dispute – Interplay of costs principles where litigation may be attributed to testator, where circumstances warranted investigation and Calderbank offers – Some allocation of costs by reference to issues Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aukuso v Tahan (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 302 Banks v Goodfellow (1870) LR 5 QB 549 Brady v Mikan [2022] NSWSC 956 Croghan v Blacktown City Council (2019) 100 NSWLR 757; [2019] NSWCA 248 Gray v Hart; Estate of Harris (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 1562 King v Hudson [2009] NSWSC 1500 Nominal Defendant v Hawkins [2011] NSWCA 93 Orton v Smith (1873) LR 3 P&D 23 Re Estate late Hazel Ruby Grounds; Page v Sedawie [2005] NSWSC 1311 Re Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Reginald Alfred Becker v Public Trustee of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1146 Shorten v Shorten (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 60 Category: Costs Parties: Belinda Brady (First Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Vesna Crnjak (Second Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant) Tony Ilijanic (Third Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) John Mikan (Defendant/Cross claimant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate